25
Car l’Éternel, ton Dieu, a en horreur quiconque agit ainsi, quiconque fait une chose déloyale.
Aussi, lorsque l’Éternel, ton Dieu, t’aura débarrassé de tous tes ennemis d’alentour, dans le pays qu’il te donne en héritage pour le posséder, tu effaceras la mémoire d’Amalec de dessous le ciel: ne l’oublie point.
Miqra according to the Masorah · Licence: CC BY-SA · Source
Bible du Rabbinat 1899 [fr] · Licence: Public Domain · Source
Deutéronome 25:6 dans toutes les traductions
English · Metsudah Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009
It shall be that the firstborn, when she is capable of bearing children, shall be established in place of his deceased brother, so that his name may not be obliterated from Yisroel.
Licence: CC BY
English · The Rashi chumash by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein
And it shall be, the first-born [i.e., the eldest of the brothers] (in an instance) where she can bear [(a woman who cannot bear is excluded from yibum)], he shall be invested in the name of his dead brother [with the latter's inheritance in his father's property], and his name shall not be wiped out of Israel. [(This excludes from yibum the wife of a saris (one who is impotent), whose name is already "wiped out.")
Licence: CC BY
עברית · Miqra according to the Masorah
וְהָיָ֗ה הַבְּכוֹר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תֵּלֵ֔ד יָק֕וּם עַל־שֵׁ֥ם אָחִ֖יו הַמֵּ֑ת וְלֹֽא־יִמָּחֶ֥ה שְׁמ֖וֹ מִיִּשְׂרָאֵֽל׃
Licence: CC BY-SA
English · The Holy Scriptures: A New Translation (JPS 1917)
And it shall be, that the first-born that she beareth shall succeed in the name of his brother that is dead, that his name be not blotted out of Israel.
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Ta'amei Hamikra
וְהָיָ֗ה הַבְּכוֹר֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תֵּלֵ֔ד יָק֕וּם עַל־שֵׁ֥ם אָחִ֖יו הַמֵּ֑ת וְלֹֽא־יִמָּחֶ֥ה שְׁמ֖וֹ מִיִּשְׂרָאֵֽל׃
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Text Only
והיה הבכור אשר תלד יקום על שם אחיו המת ולא ימחה שמו מישראל
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Nikkud
וְהָיָה הַבְּכוֹר אֲשֶׁר תֵּלֵד יָקוּם עַל־שֵׁם אָחִיו הַמֵּת וְלֹא־יִמָּחֶה שְׁמוֹ מִיִּשְׂרָאֵל׃
Licence: Public Domain
ייִדיש · Yehoyesh's Yiddish Tanakh Translation [yi]
און עס זאָל זײַן: דער ערשטלינג װאָס זי װעט געבערן, זאָל זײַן אױפֿן נאָמען פֿון זײַן געשטאָרבענעם ברודער, כּדי זײַן נאָמען זאָל ניט אױסגעמעקט װערן פֿון ישׂראל.
Licence: CC0
Français · Bible du Rabbinat 1899 [fr]
Et le premier fils qu’elle enfantera sera désigné par le nom du frère mort, afin que ce nom ne périsse pas en Israël.
Licence: Public Domain
Polski · Bible in Polish, trans. Izaak Cylkow, 1841 - 1908 [pl]
A pierworodny, którego by zrodziła, zastąpi imię brata jego zmarłego, aby nie zgładzoném było imię jego z Israela.
Licence: Public Domain
Deutsch · Die Heilige Schrift, trans. Dr. Simon Bernfeld, Berlin, 1902 - German [de]
Der Erstgeborene alsdann, den sie gebärt, soll eintreten auf den Namen seines verstorbenen Bruders, dass nicht ausgelöscht [vergessen] werde sein Name in Israel.
Licence: Public Domain
Esperanto · La Malnova Testamento, L.L.Zamenhof [eo]
Kaj la unuenaskito, kiun ŝi naskos, ricevos la nomon de lia mortinta frato, por ke ne malaperu lia nomo en Izrael.
Licence: Public Domain
Commentaires sur Deutéronome 25:6
Rashi
עברית
והיה הבכור. גדול האחים הוא מיבם אותה:
אשר תלד. פרט לאילונית שאינה יולדת:
יקום על שם אחיו. זה שיבם את אשתו יטול נחלת המת בנכסי אביו:
ולא ימחה שמו. פרט לאשת סריס ששמו מחוי:
On Your Way · Licence: Public Domain · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Targum Jonathan
English
And the first-born whom she beareth shall stand in the inheritance in the name of the deceased brother, that his name may not be blotted out from Israel.
The Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel, trans. J. W. Etheridge, London, 1862 · Licence: Public Domain · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Ibn Ezra
English
With respect to the first son that she bears, the statement that he will bear the brother’s name,
and the subsequent assurance that his name will not be extinct, both refer to inheritance , not the actual name of the child. I have already discussed the phrase that she bears in my comment on the phrase “to a foreign nation” [Exodus 21: 8] [the reference is to an earlier commentary on Exodus, known as the Perush Haqqaṣar — Translator].
Ibn Ezra on the Pentateuch; trans. by Jay F. Shachter · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Ramban (Nachmanides)
English
AND IT SHALL BE THAT THE FIRSTBORN THAT SHE BEARETH SHALL SUCCEED IN THE NAME OF HIS BROTHER THAT IS DEAD. It [the true purport thereof] is not the simple meaning that they call the first son by the name of the dead, Reuben or Shimon as his name was, for in the case of Boaz it says thus, that the name of the dead be not cut off from among his brethren, and yet they did not call the child born [to Boaz and Ruth] Machlon. But this verse by way of the Truth, [the mystic teaching of the Cabala], is an assurance and thus it is to be understood in its simple sense. And our Rabbis found support in this verse for the following laws: that the eldest [surviving] brother contracts the levirate marriage, that a sterile woman may not be contracted for such marriage, nor the wife of a eunuch since his name was “blotted out” [when he was yet alive]. Now, all these are but Scriptural supports [for laws of levirate marriage], because the laws of the sterile widow and the widow of the eunuch are derived from the very essence of the Scriptural section [and are not derived from the Scriptural supports quoted].
Commentary on the Torah by Ramban (Nachmanides). Translated and annotated by Charles B. Chavel. New York, Shilo Pub. House, 1971-1976 · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Rashbam
English
יקום הבן על שם אחיו, he will arise in the name of his brother (deceased). This is the plain meaning.
Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Sforno
English
ולא ימחה שמו מישראל, in that the child born from this union will be considered by G’d as if the deceased had fulfilled the commandment to be fruitful. This is easily understood when we consider that this child is the product of a legal marriage entered into by the deceased husband of his mother. The fact that the deceased’s brother did not have to go through a marriage ceremony with the widow of his brother makes this clear to everyone. This explains why G’d would be angry at the brother who refuses to marry his sister-in-law, as he thereby deprived his deceased brother forever from fulfilling the mitzvah of being fruitful
Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria