22
Aliya 3
Si elle avait été mise en pièces, qu’il en produise la preuve; il ne paiera point pour la bête mise en pièces.
et mon courroux s’enflammera et je vous ferai périr par le glaive et alors vos femmes aussi deviendront veuves et vos enfants orphelins.
Aliya 4
Miqra according to the Masorah · Licence: CC BY-SA · Source
Bible du Rabbinat 1899 [fr] · Licence: Public Domain · Source
Exode 22:10 dans toutes les traductions
English · Metsudah Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009
an oath to Adonoy shall be between them, that he [the watcher] did not lay his hand on his neighbor’s possession [for his personal use]. The owner must accept it [the oath], and [the watcher] need not make restitution.
Licence: CC BY
English · The Rashi chumash by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein
the oath of the L-rd shall be between both, that he (the watcher) did not send his hand against the deposit of his neighbor [to use it for himself (for if he did, and it afterwards met with mischance, he is liable)], and its owner shall accept [the oath], and he [the watcher] shall not pay.
Licence: CC BY
עברית · Miqra according to the Masorah
שְׁבֻעַ֣ת יְהֹוָ֗ה תִּהְיֶה֙ בֵּ֣ין שְׁנֵיהֶ֔ם אִם־לֹ֥א שָׁלַ֛ח יָד֖וֹ בִּמְלֶ֣אכֶת רֵעֵ֑הוּ וְלָקַ֥ח בְּעָלָ֖יו וְלֹ֥א יְשַׁלֵּֽם׃
Licence: CC BY-SA
English · The Holy Scriptures: A New Translation (JPS 1917)
the oath of the LORD shall be between them both, to see whether he have not put his hand unto his neighbour’s goods; and the owner thereof shall accept it, and he shall not make restitution.
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Ta'amei Hamikra
שְׁבֻעַ֣ת יְהוָ֗ה תִּהְיֶה֙ בֵּ֣ין שְׁנֵיהֶ֔ם אִם־לֹ֥א שָׁלַ֛ח יָד֖וֹ בִּמְלֶ֣אכֶת רֵעֵ֑הוּ וְלָקַ֥ח בְּעָלָ֖יו וְלֹ֥א יְשַׁלֵּֽם׃
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Text Only
שבעת יהוה תהיה בין שניהם אם לא שלח ידו במלאכת רעהו ולקח בעליו ולא ישלם
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Nikkud
שְׁבֻעַת יְהוָה תִּהְיֶה בֵּין שְׁנֵיהֶם אִם־לֹא שָׁלַח יָדוֹ בִּמְלֶאכֶת רֵעֵהוּ וְלָקַח בְּעָלָיו וְלֹא יְשַׁלֵּם׃
Licence: Public Domain
ייִדיש · Yehoyesh's Yiddish Tanakh Translation [yi]
זאָל אַ שבועה פֿון גאָט זײַן צװישן זײ בײדן, אױב ער האָט ניט אױסגעשטרעקט זײַן האַנט אױף זײַן חבֿרס האָב; און איר בעל־הבית זאָל עס אָננעמען, און ער דאַרף ניט באַצאָלן.
Licence: CC0
Français · Bible du Rabbinat 1899 [fr]
un serment solennel interviendra entre les parties, comme quoi l’accusé n’a point porté atteinte à la chose de son prochain; le propriétaire acceptera ce serment et l’autre ne paiera point.
Licence: Public Domain
Italiano · Il Pentateuco. Traduzione italiana di Samuel David Luzzatto, 1872 [it]
Un giuramento (pel nome) del Signore avrà luogo tra i due, (per chiarire) s’egli non ha portata la mano sulla roba del suo prossimo, ed il proprietario riceverà [quello che si trova, cioè l’animale morto, o storpiato], e l’altro non pagherà.
Licence: Public Domain
Polski · Bible in Polish, trans. Izaak Cylkow, 1841 - 1908 [pl]
Przysięga Wiekuistego będzie między obudwoma: czy nie wyciągnął ręki swej na własność bliźniego swego; i przyjmie ją właściciel jej, a ów płacić nie będzie.
Licence: Public Domain
Deutsch · Die Heilige Schrift, trans. Dr. Simon Bernfeld, Berlin, 1902 - German [de]
So soll ein Schwur beim Herrn sein zwischen beiden: dass er nicht seine Hand ausgestreckt nach der Sache seines Nächsten; das muß der Eigentümer annehmen, und [der Hüter] bezahlt nichts.
Licence: Public Domain
Deutsch · Der Pentateuch, übersetzt und erläutert von Samson Raphael Hirsch. Frankfurt am Main, 1867-1878 [de]
so hat ein Gotteseid zwischen sie beide einzutreten, wenn er nicht seine Hand an das Gut seines Nächsten gestreckt hat, den hat dessen Eigentümer entgegenzunehmen, zu ersetzen hat er nicht.
Licence: Public Domain
Esperanto · La Malnova Testamento, L.L.Zamenhof [eo]
tiam ĵuro antaŭ la Eternulo estu inter ili, ke li ne etendis sian manon sur la apartenaĵon de sia proksimulo, kaj ĝia mastro ĝin prenos kaj li ne kompensos.
Licence: Public Domain
Commentaires sur Exode 22:10
Rashi
עברית
שבעת ה' תהיה. ישבע שכן הוא כדבריו, והוא לא שלח בה יד להשתמש בה לעצמו, שאם שלח בה יד ואחר כך נאנסה, חייב באונסים:
ולקח בעליו. השבועה:
ולא ישלם. לו השומר כלום:
Rashi Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009 · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Targum Jonathan
English
an oath of the Lord shall be between them both, that he hath not put forth his hand upon the property of his neighbour; and the owner of the thing shall accept his oath, and he shall not (be required to) make it good.
The Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel, trans. J. W. Etheridge, London, 1862 · Licence: Public Domain · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Ibn Ezra
עברית
במלאכת רעהו. כמו לרגל המלאכה אשר לפני. ולא יקח ממנו רק השבועה:
On Your Way · Licence: Public Domain · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Rashbam
English
שבועת ה' תהיה בין שניהם, as a result, the trustee is not held responsible for accidents, i.e. superior force against which he could not have prevailed.
ולקח בעליו, the owner of the dead animal must accept the trustee’s oath, and he is free from paying any damages to the owner.
Eliyahu Munk, HaChut Hameshulash · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Da'at Zekenim
English
'שבועת ה, “the oath of the Lord, etc.;” Rashi explains this verse as follows: if the party in charge of the animal entrusted to him for safe keeping has illegally made use of it, as a result of which this animal came to harm, he is liable although normally anyone who looks after a friend’s property without being paid compensation is not liable for anything but the result of his negligence. Elsewhere, in the Talmud, tractate Baba Metzia folio 41, Rashi adds that even if the safe keeper had already returned the animal in question to its owner, seeing that he had illegally made use of it while it was under his care, any accident that will befall that animal will be considered as the result of that offense he had committed. According to Rabbeinu Tam, -Rashi’s grandson,- this presents a difficulty, seeing that in our verse the Torah had written that no one had witnessed the accident that had happened to said animal, i.e. we de do not even know if the circumstances were such that they could be attributed to the safe-keeper’s illegal actions. [All we know is that it occurred while the safe-keeper had not been present, as he should have been. Ed.] According to Rabbeinu Tam, the wording of the Torah implies that if the safe-keeper had witnesses who had seen that he had not been negligent or done something illegal as a result of which the accidents had become possible, he is not held responsible. According to Rashi what use would it be for the safe-keeper if there even was “proof” that he had not been at fault, seeing that the Torah requires the safe-keeper to swear an oath that he had not done anything which according to Torah law was not permissible? According to Rashi, even a true oath would not be helpful for the person who had sworn it, so why should he use the name of the Lord in vain? Besides, how could the “witnesses” know if the accused had ever committed an illegal use of what had been entrusted to him for safekeeping, if that person had in the meantime replaced the animal in the pen where he had kept it locked up? Considering all this, Rabbeinu Tam concludes that in such situations the safe-keeper is considered as innocent of wrongdoing.
Daat Zekenim translated by Rb. Eliyahu Munk · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria