21
Parachat Mishpatim
Aliya 1
Aliya 2
et s’il fait tomber une dent à son esclave ou à sa servante, il lui rendra la liberté à cause de sa dent.
Miqra according to the Masorah · Licence: CC BY-SA · Source
Bible du Rabbinat 1899 [fr] · Licence: Public Domain · Source
Exode 21:36 dans toutes les traductions
English · Metsudah Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009
If it was known that it was a goring ox from yesterday and the day before, but he had not taken proper precaution to guard it, then he must pay full compensation, an ox for an ox. The dead [animal] remains in the possession [of its owner].
Licence: CC BY
English · The Rashi chumash by Rabbi Shraga Silverstein
Or [if it were not a tam, but] it be known that it were a goring ox [a mued] from yesterday and the day before, [three gorings (including the latest)], and its owner did not guard it, then pay shall he pay, an ox [full value] for an ox, and the carcass shall belong to him [the owner of the gored ox, (the owner of the goring ox making up the difference between the value of the carcass and the full value of the gored ox)].
Licence: CC BY
עברית · Miqra according to the Masorah
א֣וֹ נוֹדַ֗ע כִּ֠י שׁ֣וֹר נַגָּ֥ח הוּא֙ מִתְּמ֣וֹל שִׁלְשֹׁ֔ם וְלֹ֥א יִשְׁמְרֶ֖נּוּ בְּעָלָ֑יו שַׁלֵּ֨ם יְשַׁלֵּ֥ם שׁוֹר֙ תַּ֣חַת הַשּׁ֔וֹר וְהַמֵּ֖ת יִֽהְיֶה־לּֽוֹ׃ {ס}
Licence: CC BY-SA
English · The Holy Scriptures: A New Translation (JPS 1917)
Or if it be known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and its owner hath not kept it in; he shall surely pay ox for ox, and the dead beast shall be his own.
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Ta'amei Hamikra
א֣וֹ נוֹדַ֗ע כִּ֠י שׁ֣וֹר נַגָּ֥ח הוּא֙ מִתְּמ֣וֹל שִׁלְשֹׁ֔ם וְלֹ֥א יִשְׁמְרֶ֖נּוּ בְּעָלָ֑יו שַׁלֵּ֨ם יְשַׁלֵּ֥ם שׁוֹר֙ תַּ֣חַת הַשּׁ֔וֹר וְהַמֵּ֖ת יִֽהְיֶה־לּֽוֹ׃ (ס)
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Text Only
או נודע כי שור נגח הוא מתמול שלשם ולא ישמרנו בעליו שלם ישלם שור תחת השור והמת יהיה לו
Licence: Public Domain
עברית · Tanach with Nikkud
אוֹ נוֹדַע כִּי שׁוֹר נַגָּח הוּא מִתְּמוֹל שִׁלְשֹׁם וְלֹא יִשְׁמְרֶנּוּ בְּעָלָיו שַׁלֵּם יְשַׁלֵּם שׁוֹר תַּחַת הַשּׁוֹר וְהַמֵּת יִהְיֶה־לּוֹ׃
Licence: Public Domain
ייִדיש · Yehoyesh's Yiddish Tanakh Translation [yi]
אױב עס איז באַװוּסט, אַז ער איז אַ שטױסיקער אָקס פֿון לאַנג אָן, און זײַן בעל־הבית האָט אים ניט געהיט, זאָל ער צאָלן באַצאָלן אַן אָקס פֿאַרן אָקס, און דער טױטער זאָל געהערן צו אים.
Licence: CC0
Français · Bible du Rabbinat 1899 [fr]
Mais si, notoirement, ce bœuf a déjà heurté à plusieurs reprises et que son maître ne l’ait pas surveillé, il devra restituer bœuf pour bœuf et le bœuf tué lui restera.
Licence: Public Domain
Italiano · Il Pentateuco. Traduzione italiana di Samuel David Luzzatto, 1872 [it]
Ove poi sia noto ch’esso era già per lo innanzi un bue cozzatore, ed il proprietario nol custodisse; pagherà un bue in cambio del bue, ed il morto sarà suo.
Licence: Public Domain
Polski · Bible in Polish, trans. Izaak Cylkow, 1841 - 1908 [pl]
Ale jeżeli było wiadomo, że to wół bodliwy od wczoraj i zawczoraj, a nie strzegł go właściciel jego - to powinien oddać wołu za wołu; a zabity niechaj należy do niego.
Licence: Public Domain
Deutsch · Die Heilige Schrift, trans. Dr. Simon Bernfeld, Berlin, 1902 - German [de]
Wenn es aber von jeher bekannt gewesen, dass der Ochse stößig ist, und sein Herr hat nicht acht auf ihn gegeben, so soll er erstatten Ochsen um Ochsen, und der tote bleibe sein.
Licence: Public Domain
Deutsch · Der Pentateuch, übersetzt und erläutert von Samson Raphael Hirsch. Frankfurt am Main, 1867-1878 [de]
Oder es ist nun erkannt, daß er ein stößiger Ochse ist, dadurch, daß er auch gestern und vorgestern gestoßen, und es hütet ihn fortan sein Eigentümer nicht: so hat er voll zu ersetzen Ochsen für Ochsen, der tote aber bleibt sein.
Licence: Public Domain
Esperanto · La Malnova Testamento, L.L.Zamenhof [eo]
Sed se oni sciis, ke la bovo estis kornobatema antaŭe, kaj ĝia mastro ĝin ne gardis, tiam ili pagu bovon pro la bovo, kaj la kadavro apartenu al li.
Licence: Public Domain
Commentaires sur Exode 21:36
Rashi
עברית
או נודע. או לא היה תם, אלא נודע כי שור נגח הוא, היום ומתמול שלשום, הרי שלש נגיחות:
שלם ישלם שור. נזק שלם:
והמת יהיה לו. לניזק, ועליו ישלים המזיק עד שישתלם ניזק כל נזקו:
Rashi Chumash, Metsudah Publications, 2009 · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Targum Jonathan
English
But if it hath been known that the ox was wont to gore in time past, and his master did not restrain him, he shall surely deliver ox for ox; but the carcase and the skin shall be his.
The Targum of Jonathan ben Uzziel, trans. J. W. Etheridge, London, 1862 · Licence: Public Domain · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Ibn Ezra
עברית
או וגו'. ואם היה השור מועד ישלם הנזק שלם. והזכיר הכתוב דבר השור עד שיגיע אל וכי יגנוב איש שור או שה. וכל זה בעבור העבד שהוא נמכר בגנבתו. כי כן החל כי תקנה עבד עברי:
On Your Way · Licence: Public Domain · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria
Ramban (Nachmanides)
English
OR IF IT BE KNOWN THAT THE OX WAS WONT TO GORE IN TIME PAST, AND ITS OWNER HATH NOT KEPT IT IN, HE SHALL SURELY PAY AN OX FOR AN OX. It is known that if a Tam is an animal which has not injured, or killed [an animal] more than three times and whose owner has not been warned that it is dangerous and must be guarded. For whatever damages a Tam does, its owner pays only half the loss. The Tam is distinguished from a Muad, an animal which has killed or injured at least four times, and whose owner has been warned that it is dangerous and must be guarded. For whatever damage it does, the owner must pay in full. too is properly guarded by its owner, but through an accident it so happened that it went out and caused damage, the owner is certainly not liable., (see Note above) since the same law applies to a Tam as well. Ramban proceeds to remove this difficulty. Thus the reason why He states only with reference to a Muad, is an animal which has not injured, or killed [an animal] more than three times and whose owner has not been warned that it is dangerous and must be guarded. For whatever damages a Tam does, its owner pays only half the loss. The Tam is distinguished from a Muad, an animal which has killed or injured at least four times, and whose owner has been warned that it is dangerous and must be guarded. For whatever damage it does, the owner must pay in full. and its owner hath not kept it in, [when the same principle would apply to a Tam as well] is, according to that Sage in the Talmud who says that a Muad needs better guarding than a Tam, as follows: Scripture states that if the ox was wont to gore and warning had been given to its owner, and he hath not kept it in and guarded it better in view of its dangerous nature, so that it went out and caused damage, the owner must pay the full damage. According to the opinion of that Sage). who holds that the degree of guarding necessary for both Tam and Muad is an animal which has not injured, or killed [an animal] more than three times and whose owner has not been warned that it is dangerous and must be guarded. For whatever damages a Tam does, its owner pays only half the loss. The Tam is distinguished from a Muad, an animal which has killed or injured at least four times, and whose owner has been warned that it is dangerous and must be guarded. For whatever damage it does, the owner must pay in full. is alike, the meaning of the verse is as follows: If it be known to the owner that the ox was wont to gore and now too [i.e., at the fourth time] he hath not kept it in, he is liable to pay the full damage on account of his grave negligence.
Commentary on the Torah by Ramban (Nachmanides). Translated and annotated by Charles B. Chavel. New York, Shilo Pub. House, 1971-1976 · Licence: CC-BY · Commentaire complet sur Sefaria